The Gift of Prophecy? Part One

Before the 2020 election, alleged prophets, Loren Sandford, Jeremiah Johnson, and Kris Vallotton, prophesied that Donald Trump would be reelected as president! How did that turn out?

Before we study biblical prophets in God’s Word, lets examine contemporary unbiblical prophets who are widespread and influential. In 2020, contributors to the World Christian Encyclopedia: A Comparative Survey of Churches and Religions in The Modern World confirmed that the Apostolic networks are among the fastest growing movements in the modern Christian world. [1] A huge part of the Apostolic networks is the continuing gift of prophecy.

Unbiblical Modern Prophets

Modern prophets are unbiblical for two reasons. First, modern unbiblical prophets do not meet the qualification of Deuteronomy 18:20-23 of fulfilling 100% of all prophecy. Second, modern unbiblical prophets misinterpret Ephesians 4:11.

Modern unbiblical prophets do not meet the qualification of Deuteronomy 18:20-23

One of the main prophets and/or leaders in the Kansas City Prophets movement was Bob Jones (no relation to Bob Jones of Bob Jones University in South Carolina), the movement's visionary.  He was said to have been specially anointed with supernatural visions from the Lord and a prophetic gift.  However, he was quoted as saying that the general level of prophetic revelation in the movement's "prophets" had an accuracy level of about 65 percent.  He said some prophets were as low as 10 percent accurate, with some of the "most mature" prophets having a rating "approaching 85 percent to 95 percent." [2]

Here is a more recent example. Craig Keener, who is a Charismatic and believes in the continuing gift of prophecy noted the failed prophecies concerning Trump’s reelection in 2020. Keener wrote: Yet certain prophets have drawn the attention of Charismatics and non-Charismatics alike by publicly confessing that their prophecies were indeed mistaken and extending their apologies. Loren Sandford, Jeremiah Johnson, and Kris Vallotton have recently expressed contrition and even repentance for incorrectly prophesying that Trump would win again in 2020.[3]

Deuteronomy 18:20-23 is the test of a prophet in the Old Testament. A biblical prophet has an accuracy rate of 100 percent.

Modern unbiblical prophets misinterpret Ephesians 4:11

Another movement that is more current that advocates the modern prophetic gift is the New Apostolic Reformation (NAR). One of NAR’s founders, Peter Wagner, wrote, “The church is to be guided and governed by prophets and apostles (Eph. 4:12–15). Prophets are people with the anointing of God to hear his voice and guide the church. God has empowered those with the gift of prophecy (that is, those who hold the office of prophet) to hear his revealed will ‘more accurately’ once the intercessors have opened heavenly portals by binding demonic powers”[4]

The New Apostolic Reformation wields massive influence today. Here is an article exposes the harmful influence: The Framing of a Movement: The New Apostolic Reformation.[5]

Bill Hamon and Peter Wagner “worked together in propagating the Apostolic Movement like Martin Luther and John Calvin worked together in propagating the Protestant Movement.” Like Luther, Hamon was the visionary behind the restoration of apostles that began what he called the “Prophetic-Apostolic Movement.” [Notice the NAR was originally named “Prophetic-Apostolic”]. Like Calvin, Wagner popularized the movement’s theology into the broader church by writing the theological designations for the different types of apostles and their various functions in what he termed the “New Apostolic Reformation.”[6]

The continuing gift of prophecy is part of the he fivefold ministry of Christ

The fivefold ministry of Christ is based on Ephesians 4:11-12 which includes pastors, teachers, evangelists, prophets, and apostles.

Bill Hamon describes how the lost gift of prophecy was restored:

  • During the 1950s, the office of evangelist was restored, evidenced by renewed emphasis on crusades and evangelistic ministries.

  • During the 1960s, the office of pastor was emphasized, followed by the office of teacher during the 1970s. Throughout the 1950s to the ’70s, Christianity saw an abundance of ministries being created to teach the restored doctrines through radio, television, and revival ministries. Among these offices, two were destined to rise above the rest and claim dominion over the others: the age of the apostles and prophets had come.

  • In 1988, the prophets were restored to the church, and

  • in 1998 apostles were restored; the Second Apostolic Age had begun. According to Hamon, all the “previous movements” of reformation throughout church history “prepared the way for the full restoration” to the fivefold ministry led by prophets and apostles. Now that the Second Apostolic Age has come, Christ calls his restored end-times church to prepare for his coming.[7]

New Testament prophets laid the church's foundation (Eph 2:20). Once the foundation was laid, their ministries ceased. See Michael Horton’s White Horse Inn article Reformed and Charismatic? Horton refutes the New Apostolic Reformation and other similar groups that believe in the continuing gift of prophecy.

Here is Horton’s refutation of NAR which he refers to as Reformed Charismatics because of the infiltration of NAR into Reformed circles:

I’ll focus on the question of whether the gifts of prophet and apostle have ceased.  In Ephesians 4:7-16, the apostle says that offices prophets and apostles as well as pastors, teachers, and evangelists are gifts of his heavenly ascension …. Against both Rome and the radical Anabaptists, the Reformers argued that prophet and apostle are extraordinary offices, for a foundation-laying era.  They are sent at key moments in redemptive history, and their writings are added to the canon of Scripture.

Against both Rome and the radical Anabaptists, the Reformers argued that prophet and apostle are extraordinary offices, for a foundation-laying era.  They are sent at key moments in redemptive history, and their writings are added to the canon of Scripture.

Cessationists hold that the New Testament itself makes a distinction between the foundation-laying era of the apostles and the era of building the church on their completed foundation (1 Cor 3:10-11).  Although the New Testament establishes the offices of pastors/teachers, elders, and deacons, it does not establish perpetual prophetic or apostolic offices with their attendant sign-gifts.[8] 

In contrast to unbiblical prophets who were hit and miss in their prognastations, biblical prophets were not only accurate in fortelling the future but also powerful in instructing their contemporaries.

Biblical Prophets

The prophets in the Old Testament were the most profound spokesman in history. [9]

1. Prophets foretold the future.

When they predicted events, it was to move their listeners to repent or be encouraged. Jonah preached his prophecy, “In forty days, Ninevah will be destroyed,” resulting in their repenting.

Old Testament prophets foretold over 300 Old Testament prophecies that were fulfilled in Christ’s 1st coming and over 400 that will be fulfilled in His 2nd coming. Isaiah has more prophecies about Christ than any other prophetic book. There are at least 22 prophecies about Christ in Isaiah.

The prophets were preachers but more than preachers. They prophesied that God would reveal future events to them. Here is God’s claim of being able to predict the future (Isa 42:8-9). These verses declare that because God has fulfilled previous prophecies, He will bring to pass future prophecies. An example of God fulfilling a previous prophecy is the prediction that God would defeat Assyria in Israel in Isaiah 10:24-27 which was fulfilled in Isaiah 37:36-38. If God does not predict and fulfil prophecies, then Isaiah’s argument that God is different from idols is destroyed.  

The Sunday evening, I got saved, the preacher a prophetic message on Hell. Hell is in the future of every person who rejects Christ as Savior.

2. Prophets forth told the Word to their contemporaries.

There are 17 prophetic books: Five Major (Isaiah, Jeremiah, Lamentations, Ezekiel, and Daniel) and Twelve Minor that cover four centuries in the Old Testament from 840 B.C. (Obadiah) to 420 B.C. (Malachi). The 17 prophetic books are called the “dark continent of Scripture.” These Old Testament dark ages needed prophets foretelling the future and forthtelling God’s Word to provoke repentance.

“The prophets spoke to Israel in times of crisis .... Had there been no crisis, there would have been little need for the prophets.” [10]

1. The prophets Amos, Hosea, Micah, and Isaiah prophesied before the crisis of the fall of the Northern Kingdom of Israel in 722 BC to Assyria (Assyria invaded Israel five times).

    1) Tiglath-pileser invaded in 743-738 B.C. (2 Kings15:19-20).

    2) He invaded again later

    3) Shalmanesser V invaded and defeated Israel in 722 B.C. Isaiah predicted this defeat.

    4) Sargon II attacked later

    5) Sennacherib attacked Israel but was defeated by a single angel in Isaiah 36-37 in 701 B.C.

2.  The prophets Zephaniah, Jeremiah, Habakkuk, Nahum, Ezekiel and Obadiah warned the Southern Kingdom of Judah not to follow the example of Israel or they would experience a similar crisis. Judah fell to Babylon in 586 BC.

3. After the 70-year exile, when Persia was the new world power, Haggai, Zechariah, Joel, and Malachi prophesied to God’s people. These prophets ministered unto the end of the Old Testament.

Augustine referred to “Seasons of the soul” or crises when sinners are more open to the gospel. For example, when my mother’s brother, Paul, an alcoholic, died, my mom looked into his casket and asked herself, where is my brother? Then, she asked herself, where would I be if I died? She knew she would be in hell. The death or crisis of her lost brother became a season of the soul and she trusted Christ as her Savior.

Prophets as individuals

A prophet was called “man of God,” “seer,” “visionary,” and “prophet.” “Prophet” during the literary period was the most common name for a prophet.

Nonwriting Prophets

Though these prophets did not record their prophecies, “The records of non-literary prophecy are not entirely lost to us for they are interwoven into the histories of Israel as they are told in the books of Samuel, Kings, Chronicles, Ezra, and Nehemiah.” [11]

“The prophets (non-literary) did not become a significant factor in religious history until the rise of the monarchy.” [12] They were the conscience of the king.

1. Samuel and Nathan.

The prophetic organization returns to Samuel, the first full-time professional prophet. (I Sam.3:21ff. lays out the office of the prophet). Prophetic organization — the prophets traveled with disciples (schools of the prophets) (Hullinger’s notes on Isaiah).

    A. Samuel, the kingmaker. The monarchy or institution of kings came into existence because of the ministry of Samuel the prophet. Samuel anointed the first two kings of Israel.

B. There was a band of prophets in 1 Samuel 10:5-13.

         1) Nathan received a vision of the temple in 2 Samuel 7:17.

         2) Nathan rebuked King David in 2 Samuel 12 concerning his sin with Bathsheba. Nathan’s message, “You are the man.”

2. Elijah and Elisha had understudies called the “sons of the prophets” (2 Kgs 6:1-7). Elijah rebuked King Ahaz in 1 Kings 17:1 with a prophecy, “As the Lord God of Israel lives, before whom I stand, there shall not be dew nor rain these years.” The nonliterary, prophets were watchdogs of the king, admonishing him to faithfulness to Yahweh.

3. Isaiah preached to Hezekiah in Isaiah 36-39. Read Isaiah 38:1-2.

4. John the Baptist was called the greatest of the prophets in Mt 11:11 who rebuked king Herod in Mt 14:4.

Since “All Scripture is God breathed and is profitable” how can we apply what the biblical prophets did in the Old and New Testament without embarrassingly prophesying future events like the predictors of Trumps second term in 2020? Michael Horton notes that “Paul [in the New Testament Epistles] treats prophecy (prophēteia) as preaching, which although illumined by the Spirit is (unlike the scriptures) un-inspired and therefore must be tested (1 Cor 12:29; 1 Thes 5:19-21).”[13] Preachers today can obviously forth tell God’s Word. In Romans 12:3-8, Paul lists service gifts that many Bible students believe are operative and beneficial for the local church today (The temporary sign gifts are absent): Prophecy (in the forth telling and not the foretelling aspect since no other sign gifts are in this list), ministry, teaching, exhorting, giving, leading, and mercy. We must preach the Word with boldness as did the prophets and even at times rebuke high up officials as did the watchdogs of kings in the Old Testament and John the Baptist in the Gospels.

In Part Two, we will focus on Isaiah the prophet.

[1] Barrett, David B; Kurian, George Thomas; Johnson, M. Todd (2020). World Christian Encyclopedia: A Comparative Survey of Churches and Religions in The Modern World. Vol. 2 Volume Set (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

[2] Steven F Cannon, "Old Wine in Old Wineskins: A Look at Kansas City Fellowship," The Quarterly Journal 10, no. 4 (October-December 1990): 8.

[3] Craig Keener, Failed Trump Prophecies Offer a Lesson in Humility, Christianity Today. January 20, 2021.

[4] C. Peter Wagner, On Earth as It Is in Heaven: Answer God’s Call to Transform the World, Ventura, CA: Regal, 2013, 29) (click to open).

[5] Evan P. PietschR. Vivian Pietsch, Modern Reformation: The Framing of a Movement: The New Apostolic Reformation, Tuesday, May 21st 2024.

[6] C. Peter Wagner, The Third Wave of the Holy Spirit: Encountering the Power of Signs and Wonders Today (Ann Arbor, MI: Servant, 1988), 107.

[7] Bullock C. Hassell, An Introduction to the Old Testament Prophetic Books (Chicago: Moody Press, 1986), 9.

[8] Bill Hamon, The Eternal Church: A Prophetic Look at the Church—Her History, Restoration, and Destiny (Shippensburg, PA: Destiny Image, 2003), 265.

[9] Michael Horton, Reformed and Charismatic?

[10] Bullock C. Hassell, An Introduction to the Old Testament Prophetic Books (Chicago: Moody Press, 1986), 11.

[11] Bullock C. Hassell, An Introduction to the Old Testament Prophetic Books (Chicago: Moody Press, 1986), 15.

[12] Ibid., 15.

[13] Michael Horton, Reformed and Charismatic?

D. A. Carson secret to successful teaching!

D. A. Carson testified about an important aspect of Christian education that we don’t often think about in this article at TGC: Carson: People Don’t Learn What I Teach Them; They Learn What I’m Excited About:

If I have learned anything in 35 or 40 years of teaching, it is that students don’t learn everything I teach them. What they learn is what I am excited about, the kinds of things I emphasize again and again and again and again. That had better be the gospel.

Read more

Research Paper: Dealing with Conflict in the Church Specifically Over the Topic of Israel  and Broadly Over Secondary Issues in General

Here is a research paper by pastor Jeff Vinci, who is one of my D.Min. students at Veritas Baptist College. I asked permission to post his paper so others could benefit from it.

Introduction

There are many issues that divide the church. Issues of doctrine, worship style, and church affiliation are at the top of this list. While some of these issues are legitimate reasons over which to part ways, there are many that do a disservice to the mission of the church and the testimony of Jesus Christ. One such issue is how the church should relate to modern Israel. Although this debate is not new, recent events have caused this debate to resurge as a hot-button issue that is causing conflict and division in the church. My thesis and the purpose of this paper are to summarize this age-old theological debate, to show the recent events that have caused this resurgence, to strategize the proper response of the church, and to list some steps the church and pastors can take to resolve conflict over this issue. It would not be academically ethical to fail to acknowledge the biased viewpoint from which this paper is written. This topic will be addressed from a primarily dispensational lens within a Baptistic theological worldview, but even if the reader disagrees with those presuppositional hermeneutics, he should hopefully see the value in the paper’s conclusions.

Read more

If God wrote your obituary, what would He say?

I used to preach funerals with a local pastor, who was asked to preach a lot of funerals. The reason he was invited so frequently was that he preached everyone into heaven. That made it difficult for me when I followed this local pastor in the funeral service and did not preach that person into heaven when there was no fruit of salvation in his/her life. I preached the gospel.

In this obituary about Moses in Deuteronomy 34, God does not have to preach Moses into heaven, because Moses’ life had already preached his funeral, and everyone knew Moses was in heaven.

Read more

Overview of the Continued Trends on the Penal Substitution View of the Atonement

An important part of systematic theology is the worldview that must be applied to the contemporary generation. D. A. Carson made this comment on this distinction between biblical theology and systematic theology:

Read more

Refutation of the Double Payment Argument

John Owen advocated a theological argument for limited atonement. A biblical or exegetical argument would be 1 John 2:2 and 5:19. Charles Ryrie discusses this biblical or exegetical argument: The only other occurrence of the phrase “the whole world” in John’s writings is in 1 John 5:19, and there it undebatably includes everybody. So, the presumption is that it also means everyone in 2:2. And this means that Christ died for all people even though all are not ultimately saved.[1] In other words, the extent of Satan’s influence in 5:19 is unlimited and so is the extent of Christ’s atonement in 2:2.

John Owens theological argument is called the Double Payment Argument, which argues if Christ paid for the sins of all sinners and all the sinners who do get saved pay for their sins in hell then there is a double payment for sins: “Is it probable that God calls any to a second payment, and requires satisfaction of them for whom, by his own acknowledgment, Christ hath made that which is full and sufficient?”[2]

Read more

Review of Coming to Grips with Genesis: Biblical Authority and the Age of the Earth by Terry Mortenson

Chapter 2 A Brief Overview of the Exegesis of Genesis 1-11: Luther to Lyell

David Hall summarizes his chapter: “What follows is a summary of the most noteworthy theologians from 1500 to roughly 1830 (about the time of Charles Lyell, the figurehead leader of the geological theory of deep time).[1]

Hall notes importantly: “When one considers the totality of primary sources, rather than the unsubstantiated claims of modern proponents of old-earth creationism, we will see that Martin Luther, John Calvin, the Westminster Divines, John Wesley, and the like are no friends of deep time or gradual creation.”[2]

The Protestant Reformers

I am only going to quote John Calvin as representative of the Protestant Reformers: “We are drawn away from all fictions to the only God who distributed his work into six days that we might not find it irksome to occupy our whole life in contemplating it.”[3] On the age of the earth, Calvin contended that the genealogies in Genesis 5 and 11 were strict chronologies (with no gaps).[4] Thomas Constable agrees with Calvin on the genealogy in Genesis: The careful recording of the age of each man when he fathered the next man in the list strongly suggests that this list is complete. Furthermore, the genealogies in 1 Chronicles 1:1-4 and Luke 3:36-38 are identical to the one in Genesis 5. There are probably no missing generations. As well as Keil and Delitzsch, 1:120-27.[5]

From Calvin to Ussher

Next, Hall quotes an impressive succession of Genevan scholars, including Theodore Beza (1519-1605), Wolfgang Musculus (1497-1563), Peter Martyr (1499-1562), and Francois Homan. I am going to cite Peter Martyr as typical of this period: “The evening and the morning were made the first days of the gathering together forth of light before the bringing forth of the sunne ....When we speak of the creation of things, we bring not forth one thing out of another after Aristotle’s manner, but we affirm all natures, as well bodies with bodies [angels, demons], to be created of another by the word of God.”[6]

Continental Reformed Theologians, 1590-1690

Zacharius Ursinus (1534-1583) speaks for many Reformers of this era. Ursinus was a student of Philip Melanchthon and wrote a commentary on the Heidelberg Catechism. Ursinus became a professor at Heidelberg in 1561. The catechism was published anonymously in 1563, but many contend he was the main contributor to writing the famous catechism.[7] In his commentary on the Heidelberg Catechism, he wrote, “According to the common reckoning, it is now counting from this 1616 of Christ, 5534 years since the creation of the world.[8]

British Puritan Exegetes

“Cambridge Fellow, William Perkins (1558-1602), was a puritan, polemicist, and preacher par excellence. His works at the height of British Puritanism became as popular as Calvin’s.”[9] On the time and days of creation, Perkins wrote: “The sixth shall be touching the tme of the beginning of the world, which is between five thousand and sixe thousand years a goe.... God could have made the world, and all things in it in one moment: but hee began and finished the whole worke in sixe distinct dates.... for the light was made the first day: but the Sune, the Moone, and the Stars were not created before the fourth day.”[10]

Reformed Theologians a Century after Westminster, 1640-1740

Hall cited one of the darlings of Reformed theologians: “Writing in 1679, Francis Turretin noted, but then rejected, the Augustinian view and sided with Ussher: ‘Nor does the sacred history written by Moses cover any more than six thousand years .... Greek history scarcely contains the history of two thousand years.’ Tuerritn went so far as to commend Ussher and others for specifying that creation happened in autumn, not spring.”[11]

Wesley and Early 19th Century Commentaries

[John] Wesley never wrote extensively on creation or the Flood, but in this work, he stated his belief that the various rock strata were “doubtless formed by the general Deluge” of Noah’s day.[12] On the age of the earth, Wesley declared: “The Scripture being the only Book in the world that gives us any account of the whole series of God’s Dispensations toward man from the Creation for four thousand years.”[13]

Joining the Church Fathers, the Reformers also advocated six-twenty-four days of creation, approximately six thousand years ago. Thus, the Great Tradition is a young earth.

[1] Terry Mortenson, Coming to Grips with Genesis (p. 54).

[2] Ibid., 55.

[3] Ibid., 56.

[4] Calvin, Genesis, p.76

[5] Thomas Constable, Netbible.org

[6] Terry Mortenson, Coming to Grips with Genesis, 62.

[7] Zacharius Ursinus: The Happy Professor

[8] Zacharius Ursinus, Commentary to the Heidelberg Confession, (Columbus: Scott and Bascom Printers, 1852).

[9] Terry Mortenson, Coming to Grips with Genesis (p. 68).

[10] William Perkins, An Exposition of the Creede, 1:143.

[11] Terry Mortenson, Coming to Grips with Genesis 71.

[12]  Ibid.,74.

[13] Wesley, Survey of the Wisdom of God in the Creation, II:227.

  

 

Review of Coming to Grips with Genesis: Biblical Authority and the Age of the Earth by Terry Mortenson

Hugh Ross wrote that “many of the early Church Fathers and other biblical scholars interpreted the creation days of Genesis 1 as long periods of time.”[1] However, the Church Fathers endorsed a six-twenty-four-day creation to combat “Greek thought [that] included kinds of evolutionary and uniformitarian concepts even before the time of Christ.”[2]

For example, Lactantius (c A.D. 250-325), a rhetorician who tutored Constantine’s son wrote, “Plato and many others of the philosophers, since their ignorance of the origin of all things, and of that primal period at which the world was made, said that many thousands of ages had passed since this beautiful arrangement of the world was completed .... Therefore let the philosophers, who enumerated thousands of ages from the beginning of the world, know that the six thousandth year is not yet completed.”[3]

Read more

Review of Coming to Grips with Genesis: Biblical Authority and the Age of the Earth by Terry Mortenson (Foreword)

In the Foreword, Henry M. Morris writes “that there are many good scientific evidences pointing to special creation, a young earth, and the global Flood, and these have been persuasively advanced by creationist scientists in debates, seminars, and conferences for many years and with great results.  But the compelling and definitive evidences are biblical, not scientific.” Why is this observation true? Because “No one has ever observed any genuine evolution taking place (macro-evolution) in the thousands of years of recorded history --- so it is certainly not a part of observational science (and real science should involve observation and repetition) .... Furthermore, despite certain disputable claims, no one has ever demonstrated an authentic evolutionary transitional series among all the billions of fossils preserved in the sedimentary rocks of the earth’s crust.”

Read more

The “Dreadful” Doctrine of Double Predestination

My mom heard a pastor preach on the subject of double predestination or reprobation, that God predestined or ordained some people to salvation and God ordained others to hell. The manner in which this preacher taught this subject left my mom in total despair over the salvation of some of her loved ones. The Scriptures do not leave believers in despair. God was not teasing in his Word when he declared, “Whosoever believes in him shall not perish but have everlasting life” (Jo 3:16).

I agree with John Calvin that the doctrine of double predestination or reprobation is a “dreadful” doctrine. Calvin, in his The Institutes of the Christian Religion, wrote: “The decree, I admit, is dreadful.” [1] However, I disagree with John Calvin that this “dreadful” doctrine is biblical.

Read more

Is Gambling Sin? Part Two

The Southern Baptist Convention, in an official statement entitled, On the Sin of Gambling [click to open], declared:

The Southern Baptist Convention has a long history of opposing gambling in its various forms, such as casinos, lotteries, racing, and other gambling schemes; and WHEREAS, Gambling violates the principle of neighbor-love, necessitating the financial loss and harm of many for the gain of a few, enjoying entertainment at the expense of others (Exodus 20:17; 22:21; Leviticus 25:17; Deuteronomy 22:1–4; Matthew 22:39; Mark 12:31; Romans 13:8–10; Galatians 5:14; James 2:8). The SBC made nine declarations against the sin of gambling.

Read more

Is Gambling Sin? Part One

John Piper received this question in Ask Pastor John: “Hello Pastor John .... The bets I place are rather modest at $20–$50 a week. Is modest online sports gambling sinful?”[1] I will return later to give Piper’s answer. I quote this young man to show that this is an important question that is often asked.

Maura J. Casey wrote a devastating article titled "Gambling with Lives." Casey relates some personal gambling tragedies:

A friend of mine told me that to escape the burdens of motherhood she would go to the casinos at 2 A.M. to gamble until 6:30 A.M., when she would go back home and get her kids ready for school. Until the day she didn’t go home in time—unable to stop playing the slots. A worried state legislator called to tell me her husband emptied her sixteen-year-old son’s college fund to gamble at the casinos. A bank manager told me about a customer who inherited $1 million and—aided by using the ATM machines at the casino to withdraw money—gambled it all away. A woman who worked at my daughter’s day care moved her family to Florida in a desperate attempt at a geographic cure after her husband drained money from his ten-year-old’s savings account and couldn’t stop going to the area casinos.[2]

Read more

Is There Healing in The Atonement?

Some Bible teachers advocate that there is healing in the atonement of Jesus on the cross based on 1 Peter 2:24: “By whose stripes we are healed.” Can you imagine the audience of Peter who were suffering persecution for their faith and witness being confused if Peter was teaching because of Jesus’ atonement, you should not be suffering. These persecuted believers were not suffering because of a lack of faith or sin. Additionally, they would have been equally confused because some of their loved ones had died. People don’t of good health.[1]

Read more

The Exclusivity of Jesus Christ, Part Two

The Christian apologist, John Lennox, who holds a Ph.D. from Oxford and another from Cambridge, rightfully contends that Christianity is distinct from every other religion. All of the religions of the world teach that the unsaved must do religious works and earn God’s acceptance somewhere in the future. Christianity teaches that when we “believe,” which is an act of our will to receive Christ as our Savior, God accepts us right then, and then we work for him.

Lennox tells how he proposed to his wife, Sally. When he proposed, he handed her a cookbook and said, If you cook more good meals than bad meals over the next 40 years, I will accept you, and we can get married. Not really; he was illustrating what the world's religions advocate.

That is what the world's religions teach. Acceptance has to be earned and is at the end of someone’s life only if the unsaved has performed more good works than bad works.

Read more

The Exclusivity of Jesus Christ, Part One

In John 14:6, Jesus made an eternally important declaration about salvation: “I am the only way to salvation or heaven.” I was talking to my friend Keith Thrasher about this sermon on John 14:6. He told me that the Lord used John 14:6 to lead him to salvation. Keith was more agnostic before salvation. In 2005, He was working at the Illinois Department of Corrections in a maximum-security facility, the same prison that housed the state’s death row.

Read more

Factual Data on Isaiah

One of the main prophets and/or leaders in the Kansas City Prophets movement was Bob Jones (no relation to Bob Jones of Bob Jones University in South Carolina), the movement's visionary.  He was said to have been specially anointed with supernatural visions from the Lord and a prophetic gift.  However, he was quoted as saying that the general level of prophetic revelation in the movement's "prophets" had an accuracy level of about 65 percent.  He said some prophets were as low as 10 percent accurate, with some of the "most mature" prophets having a rating "approaching 85 percent to 95 percent." [1]

Deuteronomy 18:20-23 is the test of a prophet in the OT. A biblical prophet has an accuracy rate of 100 percent.

Read more

Was Charlie Kirk Martyred?

Charlie Kirk was hated! The man that Charlie Kirk called pastor said that Charlie Kirk received death threats every day. That is why he had a security detail. The parents of the man who allegedly shot Charlie Kirk said their son had become more political and obsessed with Charlie Kirk. Hear what Jesus Christ said to his followers: “If the world hate you, you know that it hated me before it hated you” (John 15:18).

Read more

Review of Paul Scott Wilson's Law-Gospel View

Paul Scott Wilson presents his view of interpreting and preaching called the Law-Gospel view in Scott M. Gibson’s and Matthew D. Kim’s Homiletics and Hermeneutics (Baker Publishing Group, Kindle Edition, 2018). Wilson’s one text, one theme, one doctrine, one need, one image, and one mission is just another way of saying what many homileticians describe as one preaching unit or the text (one text), one MPS (one theme), Argumentation (one doctrine), Interest Step in the Introduction (one need), Illustration (one image), and Application (one mission).

Read more

How to Study Parables! (Part Two)

Craig Blomberg refers to one of his colleagues, Professor Elodie Emig, who “once suggested to me a remarkably concise big idea that incorporates all three lessons of the similarly structured parable of the two sons in Matthew 21:28-32. In this parable in which a son who refuses to work in his father’s vineyard later changes his mind and goes to the vineyard, in which a son who says he will work in fact doesn’t, and in which the father pronounces the former rather that the latter as having done his will, the three prongs of the passage can be neatly summed up with the affirmation, “Performance takes priority over promise.”[1] 

Read more